Rightly Ordered Government

I came across the following video on x.com today. I wanted to have the information readily available, and some things get lost/removed there so here is a link and a transcript, created for free at clideo.com (it did a decent job too). We have come to the point where the SCOTUS is often viewed as the supreme power of the land. It isn’t.

We’ve got five minutes if you would please make sure your
green light is on and then state your name and title for the record.
Thank you. It is on. My name is Publius Hulda.
I’m a retired litigation attorney and I write on the
original intent of the constitution using the federalist papers.
I do not go by Supreme Court opinions because for 200 years the Supreme Court
has been ignoring the federalist papers and
the constitution are framers given and they have.
have gone off on tangents of their own, which have nothing to do with the constitution.
the attorney general’s opinion begs the question,
he states that states can’t nullify acts of the
federal government which are authorized by the constitution,
but then he completely fails to cite article section and verse,
a clause where the constitution delegates to congress authority to restrict our arms.
when we ratified the…
constitution, we created the federal government,
we listed, enumerated every power we granted to our creature, the federal government.
article 1, section 8,
clauses 1 through 16 lists most of the powers
we delegated to congress for the government for the country at large,
we didn’t put on our list that our creature could restrict our arms,
we didn’t delegate this power to congress because our
framers wanted the American people to be heavily armed,
Alexander Hamilton and James Madison write about this
in the federalist papers in Federalist paper number 46,
James Madison writes why the American people are armed, it is so we can defend ourselves,
our communities and our states from the federal government in the event
it becomes tyrannical and oversteps the constitutional limits its powers.
In article 1, section 8, clause 16, pursuant to that, Congress passed the militia act.
of 1792,
where they required every able-bodied male citizen between the ages of 18 and 46,
except for federal officers and employees to buy a rifle,
ammunition and report to their local militia for training.
pursuing to article 1, section 8, clause 11,
congress is authorized to issue letters of mark and reprisal.v this is what authorizes private warships to make war on our enemies,
these were the privateers who fired on British ships during the war of 1812.
Our framers contemplated people who were heavily armed.
That is why we never delegated to our creature
authority to restrict our arms in any fashion whatsoever,
and when the federal government attempts to do so,
they are usurping powers which they do not possess.
The attorney general. goes by court opinions, not the constitution.
there is vast gulf between the two. we have 200 years of Supreme Court opinions and Mr.
chairman very kindly shared some of these 200 years of Supreme Court opinions,
which have nothing to do with the constitution.
Charles Evans Hughes said, over 100 years ago,
the constitution means what the judges say it means.
“that has been the prevailing dogma ever since,
and generations of lawyers have been indoctrinated with this lie.
that is why we no longer have federal government
which is held down by the chains of the constitution.
what we have is rule by five,
five judges on the Supreme Court who claim the
power to do whatever they want to us and our country.
so today we have two options,
it’s what the constitution.” says and what the Supreme Court says,
well, your oath of office requires you to obey the Constitution, not the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court is merely a creature of this
Constitution and is completely subject to its terms.
My third point, the AG asserts that the Attorney general,
I’m sorry, that the Supreme Court is the exclusive and final
authority on the extent of the powers of the federal government,
but framers knew that Supreme Court judges were as likely
as anybody else to be corrupt usurp powers and act lawlessly,
so Congress, the president and the states all have checks on the Supreme Court.
Hamilton shows in federalist number 81 that Congress’s check on lawless
supreme of lawless federal judges is to impeach them and remove them from office.v The president has his oath of office as a check on the Supreme Court,
President’s oath is to preserve, protect and defend the constitution,
it is not to obey the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court was not set up in our Constitution as the.
superior branch of the federal government, and then there’s no need for me to,
well, Madison says in his report on the Virginia Resolutions that it is a plain
principle founded in common sense that the states as the sovereign parties to the
constitution are the final authority on whether the federal government has violated
the constitution and that we may that the states may
check all branches of the federal government,
not just they may check the judiciary,
the executive and the legislative branches by nullifying their acts.
if the judicial branch connives with other branches usurping powers,
our constitution will be destroyed if we do not stop them.
this is what James Madison said in his notes on in his report on the Virginia resolution.
I’m sorry didn’t have time to finish, hope that during questions.
Someone will ask me about the so-called nullification crisis of